ANIL VYANKATRAO JAGTAP AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS SEC. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT AND ORS — WP/4178/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010066332026

Filing Number

WP/3809/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/4178/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL VYANKATRAO JAGTAP AND ORS

    Adv. Sandeep B Sontakke

  2. 2.AEVIND BAPU SALUKE

  3. 3.CHANDRAKANT KISAN POTE

  4. 4.TUKARAM NIVRUTTI KARE

  5. 5.RAJU KISAN GAIKWAD

  6. 6.SHAIKH GULNAR BANO ANIS AHMED

  7. 7.MAQUSOOD AZIZ SHAIKH

  8. 8.JAYASHRI SHIVAJI MANE

  9. 9.PANDURANG RADHU GONDAL

  10. 10.VITTHAL BHIMAJI LANDAGE

  11. 11.MADHAV DAMU JADHAV

  12. 12.SANGITA BABU JAGTAP

  13. 13.VISHWANATH MARUTI PARDESHI

  14. 14.SNEHA SURENDRA MHASKAR

  15. 15.SUNITA DATTATRAYA VANSHIV

  16. 16.DATTATRAYA MAHADEO KOSHTI

  17. 17.TARKA WD/O PRABHAKAR TILEKAR

  18. 18.SHRUTI SANJEEV BHATE

  19. 19.PRAMOD NARAYAN DESAI

  20. 20.NUTAN PRAMOD SAMUDRA

  21. 21.AMIT RAMDAS SUPEKAR

  22. 22.NAMDEV SITARAM LANDE

  23. 23.SUVARNA NARAYAN CHAVAN AND SUVARNA RAHUL MESHRAM

  24. 24.DILIP SUDHAKAR PAYGUDE

  25. 25.NEELAM CHANDRASEN GAWANDE

  26. 26.ASHWINI ASHOK KADAM

  27. 27.SHIVAJI DAGDU GAWALI

  28. 28.SUREKHA WD/O KISHOR PATIL

  29. 29.NASIRUDDIN QUTUBUDDIN SHAIKH

  30. 30.PRAMOD RAMESH MHASKE

  31. 31.PRAMOD SADASHIV SARODE

  32. 32.SHANTARAM SITARAM SHINGADE

  33. 33.NIRMALA DAMODAR SHINGADE

  34. 34.LATE SHANTABAI SOMNATH ALHAT

  35. 35.SANJEEVKUMAR RAGHUNATH ALHAT

  36. 36.PRAMOD SHANKARRAO POTDAR

  37. 37.NEELIMA ASHOK KADAM

  38. 38.MUKUND ARJUN SARPE

  39. 39.MEGHANA DILIP TILEKAR

  40. 40.LATE NIRMALA SUBHASH PANDE

  41. 41.VARSHA AJAY KATAKE

  42. 42.LATE AMBIKA SURESH BALE THROUGH SURESH LAXMAN BALE

  43. 43.SHAMRAO PANDURANG WAGHMODE

  44. 44.SHOBHA PARSHURAM KATURDE, WD/O LATE PARSHURAM GANGARAM KATURDE

  45. 45.AMIRA HUSEN JOHN

  46. 46.SUNITA ANANDA KHALATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS SEC. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.THE STATE OD MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY CO-OPERATION, MARKETING AND TEXTILE DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER FOR CO-OPERATION AND REGISTRAR

  5. 5.THE DIRECTOR ACCOUNTS AND TREASURIES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court allowed multiple consolidated writ petitions, holding that Maharashtra's Government Resolution of 24/08/2017 discontinuing advance increments for outstanding work operates only prospectively and cannot be applied retrospectively. The court declared petitioners (state employees) eligible for advance increments granted prior to 24/08/2017, with all consequential benefits to be recalculated and paid within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    For Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court allowed multiple consolidated writ petitions, holding that Maharashtra's Government Resolution of 24/08/2017 discontinuing advance increments for outstanding work operates only prospectively and cannot be applied retrospectively. The court declared petitioners (state employees) eligible for advance increments granted prior to 24/08/2017, with all consequential benefits to be recalculated and paid within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case