FORTUNES SPARSH HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRIN. SEC. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR — HCBM10066202026
Case under The Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010066202026
Filing Number
WP/3802/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
TENDER MATTERS ( 44 )
Sub-Category
Tender of Other Projects ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FORTUNES SPARSH HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD.
Adv. AdvVrushali
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRIN. SEC. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR
-
2.PIMPRI-CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRO ITS COMMISSIONER
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 3802 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court was granted a final opportunity to cure office objections. The petitioner's advocate failed to remove procedural defects despite previous directives and a two-week extension granted on 26th March 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) directed removal of office objections within two weeks, with an automatic refusal of registration if compliance is not achieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
26-Mar-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 3802 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court was granted a final opportunity to cure office objections. The petitioner's advocate failed to remove procedural defects despite previous directives and a two-week extension granted on 26th March 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) directed removal of office objections within two weeks, with an automatic refusal of registration if compliance is not achieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts