PAWAN MIRANI AND ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/2139/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010066112026

Filing Number

WP/3797/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/2139/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN MIRANI AND ORS

    Adv. Minal Chandnani

  2. 2.DEEPAKMIRANI

  3. 3.HONEY MIRANI

  4. 4.SAPNA MIRANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

  2. 2.THE SHAMRAO VITHAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

    Adv. V DESHPANDE AND COMPANY

  3. 3.THE TEHSILDAR, ULHASNAGAR

  4. 4.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

  5. 5.DURGESH S. CHANDAVARKAR

  6. 6.ARUN D. MAVINKURVE

  7. 7.RAGHU NANDAN U. BANGALOREKAR

  8. 8.PRAKASH A. BIJOOR

  9. 9.PRAMOD D. DHEDDE

  10. 10.SUNIL S. GOKARN

  11. 11.GIRISH R. KARNAD

  12. 12.SUDHIR S. MUNDKUR

  13. 13.SUDHIR S. MUNDKUR

  14. 14.SATISH TONSE RAO

  15. 15.GAUTAM K. MUDBHATKAL

  16. 16.AMARNATH V. SAVNAL

  17. 17.MAITREYI S. SANADI

  18. 18.SEEMA D. TRIKANNAD

  19. 19.RUBAB N. TADVI

  20. 20.RAVINDER SINGH

  21. 21.ROHAN RAJIV PAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted an extension of time to the Debts Recovery Tribunal – 3, Mumbai to dispose of Interim Application No. 91 of 2024 by 25th April 2026, after arguments were heard on 15th March 2026. The court made clear that no further extensions shall be granted and the DRT must scrupulously comply with this deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2139/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted an extension of time to the Debts Recovery Tribunal – 3, Mumbai to dispose of Interim Application No. 91 of 2024 by 25th April 2026, after arguments were heard on 15th March 2026. The court made clear that no further extensions shall be granted and the DRT must scrupulously comply with this deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case