CTL Logistics India Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — WP/2031/2026
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Status: Due Admission - 1. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010065802026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
WP/3784/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/2031/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CTL Logistics India Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
-
2.Commissioner, CGST and C Ex, Belapur
Adv. UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India
Adv. ,SUMAN DAS,SUMAN DAS,SUMAN DAS 1123
-
2.Joint Commissioner CGST and C Ex, Belapur
-
3.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
Summary of WP/2031/2026 (CTL Logistics India Private Limited) Court: Bombay High Court (Division Bench: Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) Date: 17 April 2026 Key Issue: Whether consolidated/bunched show-cause notices covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 are permissible Order Petitions Dismissed (with direction to constitute Larger Bench) The Court dismissed all petitions in this batch challenging consolidated show-cause notices issued for multiple financial years. However, the Court identified significant legal issues requiring determination by a Larger Bench due to conflicting High Court judgments on this issue. Critical Findings The Division Bench held: 1. Consolidated notices ARE permissible — Sections 73(1) and 74(1) read with Section 73(3)/74(3) do NOT restrict issuance of show-cause notices to single tax periods 2. Limitation provisions (Subsections 10) do NOT restrict notice issuance — Subsection (10) prescribes limitation for passing *orders*, not for issuing notices. These are separate statutory concepts. 3. Nature of ITC disputes justifies consolidation — For fraudulent ITC availment cases, transactions often span multiple years; consolidation enables proper investigation 4. Supreme Court precedent favors consolidation — The Supreme Court's dismissal of the Special Leave Petition in *Mathur Polymers* (7 November 2025) establishes that consolidated notices are valid Questions Referred to Larger Bench 1. Whether subsection (10) controls subsection (1) regarding consolidated notices 2. Whether subsection (10) *per se* prohibits consolidated notices 3. Effect of Section 160 CGST Act on consolidated proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc Good Earth Developers* decision (holding consolidation invalid) is correct 5. Legal position established by Supreme Court's order in *Mathur Polymers* Relief Granted - All interim orders previously passed continue until the Larger Bench decides Status: Case adjourned pending Larger Bench constitution by Chief Justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2031/2026
Summary of WP/2031/2026 (CTL Logistics India Private Limited) Court: Bombay High Court (Division Bench: Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) Date: 17 April 2026 Key Issue: Whether consolidated/bunched show-cause notices covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 are permissible Order Petitions Dismissed (with direction to constitute Larger Bench) The Court dismissed all petitions in this batch challenging consolidated show-cause notices issued for multiple financial years. However, the Court identified significant legal issues requiring determination by a Larger Bench due to conflicting High Court judgments on this issue. Critical Findings The Division Bench held: 1. Consolidated notices ARE permissible — Sections 73(1) and 74(1) read with Section 73(3)/74(3) do NOT restrict issuance of show-cause notices to single tax periods 2. Limitation provisions (Subsections 10) do NOT restrict notice issuance — Subsection (10) prescribes limitation for passing *orders*, not for issuing notices. These are separate statutory concepts. 3. Nature of ITC disputes justifies consolidation — For fraudulent ITC availment cases, transactions often span multiple years; consolidation enables proper investigation 4. Supreme Court precedent favors consolidation — The Supreme Court's dismissal of the Special Leave Petition in *Mathur Polymers* (7 November 2025) establishes that consolidated notices are valid Questions Referred to Larger Bench 1. Whether subsection (10) controls subsection (1) regarding consolidated notices 2. Whether subsection (10) *per se* prohibits consolidated notices 3. Effect of Section 160 CGST Act on consolidated proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc Good Earth Developers* decision (holding consolidation invalid) is correct 5. Legal position established by Supreme Court's order in *Mathur Polymers* Relief Granted - All interim orders previously passed continue until the Larger Bench decides Status: Case adjourned pending Larger Bench constitution by Chief Justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts