ARUN KRISHNA SUTAR AND ORS vs GAJANAN SHANKAR TAMBUTKAR AND ORS — WP/4436/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010064722026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/3721/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

WP/4436/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ARUN KRISHNA SUTAR AND ORS

Adv. VISHWABHUSHAN KAMBLE

NIRABAI KRISHNA ALIAS BAKRU MATANKAR

SUMAN MADHUKAR ADISTAKAR ALIAS PARANDEKAR

Respondent(s)

GAJANAN SHANKAR TAMBUTKAR AND ORS

DEEPAK SHANKAR TAMBUTKAR

ASMITA ANIL KIRADVKAR

ISHA ALIAS RATNAPRABHA VISHWAS SUTAR

USHA DHONDU NIGDEKAR

MANISHA GANESH SUTAR

SHANTA SURESH VALANKAR

SUVARNA VITTHAL KAMBLE

ANKUSH RAMAN THAMANKAR

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (LAND ACQUISITION) MAHAD

LEARNED COLLECTOR ALIBAUG

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HETWANE CANAL DIVISION PEN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

15-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

20-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 4436 of 2026 as withdrawn after the petitioners sought leave to withdraw following the court's expression of disinclination to entertain the petition. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to pursue alternative legal remedies and stated that any future proceedings shall be decided on merits without being influenced by observations in the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 4436 of 2026 as withdrawn after the petitioners sought leave to withdraw following the court's expression of disinclination to entertain the petition. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to pursue alternative legal remedies and stated that any future proceedings shall be decided on merits without being influenced by observations in the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case