PURUSHOTTAM SHRIDHAR JOSHI AND ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — HCBM10064382026

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010064382026

Filing Number

WP/3709/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )

Sub-Category

RESTORATION OF POSSESSION ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PURUSHOTTAM SHRIDHAR JOSHI AND ORS

    Adv. ANIKET RANADE

  2. 2.MADHUKAR SHRIDHAR JOSHI

  3. 3.SUDHAKAR SHRIDHAR JOSHI

  4. 4.RAJENDRA UTTAMCHAND LODHA

  5. 5.SUREKHA RAJNDRA LODHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS

  2. 2.RAMCHANDRA HARI ADHARI

  3. 3.DATTATRAY HARI ADHARI

  4. 4.MARUTI HARI ADHARI

  5. 5.INDUBAI MADHU ADHARI

  6. 6.BAYDABAI HARI VIRNAK

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 3709 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 5th March 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week opportunity to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 3709 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 5th March 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week opportunity to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case