SATYA DARSHAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED AND ORS. vs BHAGWAN SHAHADRAO JADHAV AND ORS. — IA/1310/2026

Case under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 218(D). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010063202026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

IA/3642/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

IA/1310/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 218(D)

Petitioner(s)

SATYA DARSHAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED AND ORS.

Adv. Aniesh S Jadhav

SATISH JAOKAR- THEN CHAIRMAN OF APPELLANT NO.

PRAFUL CHAVAN- THEN SECRETARY OF APPELLANT NO.

RAJENDRA HANDE - THEN JOINT SECRETARY OF APPELLANT NO.

JANARDHAN KOTIAN- THEN TREASURER OF APPELLANT NO.

PADEEP KAMESHWAR- THEN COMMITTEE MEMBER OF APPELLANT NO.

MIHIR LOKHANDWALA- THEN COMMITTEE MEMBER OF APPELLANT NO.

NAGESH KADAM -THEN COMMITTEE MEMBER OF APPELLANT NO.

PRADNYESH CHAVAN- THEN COMMITTEE MEMBER, OF APPELLANT NO.1

Respondent(s)

BHAGWAN SHAHADRAO JADHAV AND ORS.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

DEPUTY REGISTER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

SUHAS NADKARNI (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS.4.1 AND 4.2(Legal Heir)4.

SUNILA SUHAS NADKARNI (WIFE)4.

APURVA SUHAS NADKARNI

BLAWANT CHONDANKAR (SINCE DECEASED THR.LRS. 5.1 AND 5.

THEN COMMITTEE MEMBER OF APPELLANT NO.1(Legal Heir)5.

JEEVAN BALWANT CHODANKAR5.

SAPNA BALWANT CHODANKAR

Hearing History

Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

15-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

28-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

17-03-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

05-05-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Case Summary: In Interim Application No. 1310 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. The court ordered that service of notices on respondents 5a to 5b be awaited for 2 weeks (excluding summer vacation), with a similar 2-week adjournment for service of notices on respondents 4a to 4b in the related Interim Application No. 1309 of 2026. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Interim Application No. 1310 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. The court ordered that service of notices on respondents 5a to 5b be awaited for 2 weeks (excluding summer vacation), with a similar 2-week adjournment for service of notices on respondents 4a to 4b in the related Interim Application No. 1309 of 2026. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case