THANE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING AND ANR. vs ATMARAM GOPAL SHINDE AND ORS. Advocate - ravindra b nair, R. NO. 1 TO 11, 13,Rahul Oak Adv,Vaibhav Jagdale — WP/3654/2018

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Apr-2018

CNR: HCBM010061432018

Filing Number

WP/3945/2018

Filing Date

07-Feb-2018

Registration No

WP/3654/2018

Registration Date

22-Mar-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THANE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING AND ANR.

    Adv. Advocate- ,Adv Anand Shrikant Kulkarni

  2. 2.THE TRANSPORT MANAGER, THANE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING

    Adv. Adv Anand Shrikant Kulkarni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATMARAM GOPAL SHINDE AND ORS. Advocate - ravindra b nair, R. NO. 1 TO 11, 13,Rahul Oak Adv,Vaibhav Jagdale

  2. 2.PRAKASH MOGAL TRIBHUVAN (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS HEIRS)(Legal Heir)2.

  3. 3.VANDANA PRAKASH TRIBHUVAN

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale2.

  4. 4.NAVNATH PRAKASH TRIBHUVAN2.

  5. 5.KARTIK PRAKASH TRIBHUVAN

  6. 6.ARUN BHAU BABAR

  7. 7.IRFAN ABUBAKAR VAREKAR

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale

  8. 8.RAGHUNATH BALU GIRDALE

  9. 9.PANDRINATH B. BHOIR

  10. 10.YUNUS JAMBIR SAYYED

  11. 11.BAJIRAO ABAJI SALUNKHE

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale

  12. 12.SALIM CHANDBHAI PATHAN

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale

  13. 13.ASHOK KESHAV GAIKWAD

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale

  14. 14.VINOD KRISHNA RAUT

  15. 15.GULAB MUBARAK SHAIKH

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale

  16. 16.KAILAS SADHASHIV LOHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's decision granting bus drivers employed by Thane Municipal Transport financial benefits (time-scale promotion) after 15 years of service under the Government Resolution dated 10 June 2002, despite their lack of educational qualifications for the promotional post of Traffic Controller. The Court distinguished between actual promotion (which requires qualifications) and financial upgradation/in situ benefit schemes, holding that the modified 2002 Resolution requires only length of service, not educational eligibility, making the respondents entitled to the monetary benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  14. 30-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  15. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  16. 23-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  19. 13-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  20. 12-Nov-2024

    —View PDF

  21. 24-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  22. 12-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  23. 21-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  25. 29-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  26. 29-Feb-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  27. 15-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  28. 15-Feb-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  29. 01-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  30. 27-Sep-2022

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

  31. 05-Sep-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF

  32. 05-Sep-2022

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre

  33. 22-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. SambreView PDF

  34. 04-Apr-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A. K. MenonView PDF

  35. 04-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 07-Feb-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3654/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's decision granting bus drivers employed by Thane Municipal Transport financial benefits (time-scale promotion) after 15 years of service under the Government Resolution dated 10 June 2002, despite their lack of educational qualifications for the promotional post of Traffic Controller. The Court distinguished between actual promotion (which requires qualifications) and financial upgradation/in situ benefit schemes, holding that the modified 2002 Resolution requires only length of service, not educational eligibility, making the respondents entitled to the monetary benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case