RAGHO JAYRAM PATIL DECD THROU. L.H. AND ORS vs THE LAND ACQUISITIION OFFICER ALIAS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER ULHASNAGAR AND ORS — WP/2076/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010061422026

Filing Number

WP/3545/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/2076/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGHO JAYRAM PATIL DECD THROU. L.H. AND ORS

    Adv. Dilip Shinde

  2. 2.ASHABAI VISHNU MADHAVI

  3. 3.MANKABAI HARICHANDRA

  4. 4.GULAB BAI BALARAM GONDHALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE LAND ACQUISITIION OFFICER ALIAS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER ULHASNAGAR AND ORS

  2. 2.DASHRATH RAGHUNATH BHANDARI (DECEASED THROUGH LRS)(Legal Heir)2.

  3. 3.NANDABAI DASHRATH BHANDARI2.

  4. 4.ANKUSH DASHRATH BHANDARI2.

  5. 5.SAMEER DASHRATH BHANDARI2.

  6. 6.SOMNATH DASHRATH BHANDARI

  7. 7.BADSHAH BHAGWAN HILAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature, holding that the petitioners' prayers to refer disputes under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and to restrain compensation disbursement were premature since the Land Acquisition Officer had not yet passed the land acquisition award for the relevant Gat Number. The court allowed the petitioners liberty to file fresh proceedings after the award is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2076/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature, holding that the petitioners' prayers to refer disputes under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and to restrain compensation disbursement were premature since the Land Acquisition Officer had not yet passed the land acquisition award for the relevant Gat Number. The court allowed the petitioners liberty to file fresh proceedings after the award is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case