THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SMT. REENA MANDON SAROJ AND ORS. — CAF/771/2019
Case under Workmens Compensation Act. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 03rd April 2025.
CNR: HCBM010061422019
Next Hearing
12th March 2019
Filing Number
CAF/3662/2019
Filing Date
01-02-2019
Registration No
CAF/771/2019
Registration Date
21-02-2019
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
WORKMEN COMPENSATION ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
03rd April 2025
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. Shalini Shankar
Respondent(s)
SMT. REENA MANDON SAROJ AND ORS.
MASTER. SAMAR MANDON SAROJ
MR. RAMASHRAY MOHAN SAROJ
SMT. RADHIKA RAMASHRAY SAROJ
MR. PHILIP SANJIV NEDURI@MEDURE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
FOR ORDERS CONDONATION OF DELAY CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)
FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)
FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)
FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2019 | FOR ORDERS CONDONATION OF DELAY CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 16-02-2024 | FOR ORDERS (REGULAR) |
| 23-03-2022 | FOR ORDERS (REGULAR) |
| 18-01-2022 | FOR ORDERS (REGULAR) |
| 17-01-2022 | FOR ORDERS (REGULAR) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s application seeking condonation of a 350-day delay in filing an appeal. The court found the delay substantial and unjustified, noting the applicant's vague explanation of needing legal advice with no supporting details, and held that the application was filed negligently despite the underlying civil application being dismissed in 2020. Consequently, both the delay condonation application and the first appeal were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s application seeking condonation of a 350-day delay in filing an appeal. The court found the delay substantial and unjustified, noting the applicant's vague explanation of needing legal advice with no supporting details, and held that the application was filed negligently despite the underlying civil application being dismissed in 2020. Consequently, both the delay condonation application and the first appeal were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts