RAJANI NAGARGOJE vs THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND ORS — WP/2238/2026

Case under Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act Section NA. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010061242026

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/3536/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

WP/2238/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY SERVICE MATTERS ( 47 )

Sub-Category

Cantonment Areas ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

RAJANI NAGARGOJE

Adv. NITIN GAWARE PATIL

Respondent(s)

THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND ORS

MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

ASHTANG SHIKSHAN MANDAL, PUNE

ASHTANG AYURVED CLG.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

23-02-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

10-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

16-04-2026

FOR DISMISSAL

10-04-2026

FOR DISMISSAL

27-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Case Summary: WP/2238/2026 Outcome: The Bombay High Court admitted the petition and issued notice to respondents returnable on 10 June 2026. As an interim measure, the court directed Respondent No.4 to keep one Assistant Professor post in the Shalakyatantra Department vacant pending the next hearing, thereby granting status quo relief to the petitioner challenging the impugned advertisement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2238/2026 Outcome: The Bombay High Court admitted the petition and issued notice to respondents returnable on 10 June 2026. As an interim measure, the court directed Respondent No.4 to keep one Assistant Professor post in the Shalakyatantra Department vacant pending the next hearing, thereby granting status quo relief to the petitioner challenging the impugned advertisement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case