VITTHAL BABAN NAKADE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/558/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010061152026
Filing Number
BA/2585/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
BA/558/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VITTHAL BABAN NAKADE
Adv. Jayant Bardeskar
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 10-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 11-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: BA/558/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Vitthal Baban Nakade in a murder case (Crime No. 545 of 2024) on the ground of parity, noting that the co-accused—who was assigned a greater role in the killing and at whose instance the victim's body was recovered—had already been enlarged on bail. The court found insufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the crime beyond alleged financial transactions with the co-accused. Bail was granted on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with conditions including bi-monthly police reporting, travel restrictions within Maharashtra, and prohibition on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA/558/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Vitthal Baban Nakade in a murder case (Crime No. 545 of 2024) on the ground of parity, noting that the co-accused—who was assigned a greater role in the killing and at whose instance the victim's body was recovered—had already been enlarged on bail. The court found insufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the crime beyond alleged financial transactions with the co-accused. Bail was granted on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with conditions including bi-monthly police reporting, travel restrictions within Maharashtra, and prohibition on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts