THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR RESETTLEMENT PUNE GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS WRIT CELL vs SHIVA NAMA NAVALE SINCE DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIR 1. — IA/2910/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010058602026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

IA/3392/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

IA/2910/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR RESETTLEMENT PUNE GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS WRIT CELL

Respondent(s)

SHIVA NAMA NAVALE SINCE DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIR 1.

BABAN SHIVRAM NAVALE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIR1.

GORAKH BABAN NAVALE

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT MANTRALAYA

THE COLLECTOR PUNE

THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR PUNE

THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KHED SUB DIVISION KHED

THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR SLAO NO 11

Orders

20-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI,HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

Summary The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the State Government directed to decide on alternate land allotment (at Koregaon Bhima, Pune) by the next hearing date, with the Principal Secretary required to appear if the decision is not taken. The court rejected the petitioner's interim application for extension, noting prior orders explicitly prohibited further extensions, and directed the petitioner to pursue separate proceedings if aggrieved by the State's policy decision to offer alternate land at Pathethan instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the State Government directed to decide on alternate land allotment (at Koregaon Bhima, Pune) by the next hearing date, with the Principal Secretary required to appear if the decision is not taken. The court rejected the petitioner's interim application for extension, noting prior orders explicitly prohibited further extensions, and directed the petitioner to pursue separate proceedings if aggrieved by the State's policy decision to offer alternate land at Pathethan instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case