THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR RESETTLEMENT PUNE GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS WRIT CELL vs SHIVA NAMA NAVALE SINCE DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIR 1. — IA/2910/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010058602026
e-Filing Number
03-02-2026
Filing Number
IA/3392/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
IA/2910/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR RESETTLEMENT PUNE GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS WRIT CELL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVA NAMA NAVALE SINCE DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIR 1.
-
2.BABAN SHIVRAM NAVALE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIR1.
-
3.GORAKH BABAN NAVALE
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT MANTRALAYA
-
5.THE COLLECTOR PUNE
-
6.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR PUNE
-
7.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KHED SUB DIVISION KHED
-
8.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR SLAO NO 11
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
Summary The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the State Government directed to decide on alternate land allotment (at Koregaon Bhima, Pune) by the next hearing date, with the Principal Secretary required to appear if the decision is not taken. The court rejected the petitioner's interim application for extension, noting prior orders explicitly prohibited further extensions, and directed the petitioner to pursue separate proceedings if aggrieved by the State's policy decision to offer alternate land at Pathethan instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/2910/2026
Summary The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the State Government directed to decide on alternate land allotment (at Koregaon Bhima, Pune) by the next hearing date, with the Principal Secretary required to appear if the decision is not taken. The court rejected the petitioner's interim application for extension, noting prior orders explicitly prohibited further extensions, and directed the petitioner to pursue separate proceedings if aggrieved by the State's policy decision to offer alternate land at Pathethan instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts