NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Sainand Chaugule vs NITESH MOHANLAL VORA — HCBM10058142026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010058142026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
IA/3371/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Sainand Chaugule
Respondent(s)
NITESH MOHANLAL VORA
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Summary: In this Interim Application filed in the Bombay High Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd. (through advocate Sainand Chaugule) sought directions regarding a motor accident claim where the sole respondent died on 17.12.2015 during appeal proceedings. The First Appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with a conditional order dated 13.02.2015, and the deceased's legal representatives were directed by MACT Mumbai to approach the High Court for payment of deposited amounts. The Registrar directed the applicant to take necessary recourse of law and ordered the matter to be placed before the Hon'ble Court after vacation, effectively adjourning the matter for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Interim Application filed in the Bombay High Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd. (through advocate Sainand Chaugule) sought directions regarding a motor accident claim where the sole respondent died on 17.12.2015 during appeal proceedings. The First Appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with a conditional order dated 13.02.2015, and the deceased's legal representatives were directed by MACT Mumbai to approach the High Court for payment of deposited amounts. The Registrar directed the applicant to take necessary recourse of law and ordered the matter to be placed before the Hon'ble Court after vacation, effectively adjourning the matter for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts