MR.JIMI FRAMJI JESIA AND ORS. ROMPAL S. KOHLI, VP FILED FOR PET.,C.K. LEGAL vs EDULJI MANEKJI AMROLIA AND ORS. Advocate - Piyush Shah, PIYUSH SHAH FOR R.NO.3 — CRA/363/2012
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010058082012
Next Hearing
24th February 2012
Filing Number
CRA/3732/2012
Filing Date
08-02-2012
Registration No
CRA/363/2012
Registration Date
08-05-2012
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
ALTERNATE ACCOMODATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR.JIMI FRAMJI JESIA AND ORS. ROMPAL S. KOHLI, VP FILED FOR PET.,C.K. LEGAL
SHRI DINYR FRAMROZE PANTHAKI
SHRI ADI DHUNJI SHAW VASAIGARA
Respondent(s)
EDULJI MANEKJI AMROLIA AND ORS. Advocate - Piyush Shah, PIYUSH SHAH FOR R.NO.3
KARL MINOO BAMBOAT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
FOR ORDERS
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-02-2012 | FOR ORDERS |
| 15-07-2019 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 12-06-2019 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 27-02-2013 | FOR ORDERS |
| 13-02-2013 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the civil revision application filed by Mr. Jimi Framji Jesia and others for default, as no counsel appeared for the applicants during the hearing. The respondent No.3 (tenant) had already succeeded in both lower courts, and the application was dismissed without substantive consideration due to the applicants' non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the civil revision application filed by Mr. Jimi Framji Jesia and others for default, as no counsel appeared for the applicants during the hearing. The respondent No.3 (tenant) had already succeeded in both lower courts, and the application was dismissed without substantive consideration due to the applicants' non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts