KALPANA SURESH RAMCHANDANI vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - SUNIL KADAM — WP/4723/2026

Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section NA. Status: Fresh Admission. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Fresh Admission Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010054502026

Filing Number

WP/3169/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/4723/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

DRT Matters ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALPANA SURESH RAMCHANDANI

    Adv. Swapan Samdani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - SUNIL KADAM

  2. 2.GAUTAM GHOSH

  3. 3.ARUN SHIVNATH AMLE

  4. 4.RAMESH RAMCHANDRA KALYANKAR

  5. 5.RASIK RAMESH KALYANKAR

  6. 6.RACHNA RAMESH KALYANKAR

  7. 7.R R KALYANKAR CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4723/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for four weeks. The Bombay High Court expressed prima facie opinion that the writ petitions may not be maintainable, suggesting the petitioner should pursue remedies under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Petitioner's counsel sought time to respond to this jurisdictional challenge. Matter listed for further hearing on 12th June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4723/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4723/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for four weeks. The Bombay High Court expressed prima facie opinion that the writ petitions may not be maintainable, suggesting the petitioner should pursue remedies under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Petitioner's counsel sought time to respond to this jurisdictional challenge. Matter listed for further hearing on 12th June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case