Vivek Arun Limaye vs Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate Mumbai Zone II Advocate - Bharat Jadhav — REVN/33/2025
Case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 397(2). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010052852025
e-Filing Number
25-01-2025
Filing Number
REVN/2119/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
REVN/33/2025
Registration Date
28-01-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vivek Arun Limaye
Adv. Manohar Vasu Shetty
Respondent(s)
Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate Mumbai Zone II Advocate - Bharat Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 11-11-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 22-09-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court allowed Dr. Vivek Arun Limaye's revision application and discharged him from a PMLA case. The court found that his 2012 transactions with accused Mahesh Kisan Motewar for hospital sale were genuine and predated the criminal offence registration (2015), making continued prosecution an abuse of process. The applicant's innocence was evident from bank records showing transparency about MOUs and loan repayments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court allowed Dr. Vivek Arun Limaye's revision application and discharged him from a PMLA case. The court found that his 2012 transactions with accused Mahesh Kisan Motewar for hospital sale were genuine and predated the criminal offence registration (2015), making continued prosecution an abuse of process. The applicant's innocence was evident from bank records showing transparency about MOUs and loan repayments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts