VIJAY MANOHAR KALOKHE AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/439/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010048122026
Filing Number
BA/2023/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
BA/439/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAY MANOHAR KALOKHE AND ANR
Adv. Shailesh Kharat
MR. MAHENDRA VASANT KALOKHE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR PASSING ORDER
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 25-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted bail to applicants Vijay Manohar Kalokhe and Mahendra Vasant Kalokhe, accused of assaulting a person with a sickle causing grievous injuries under BNS sections 109, 118, 126(2), 351, and 3(5). The court released them on personal recognizance bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties, considering they had been in custody for six months and investigation was completed with charge-sheet filed, balancing this against prosecution concerns about absconding and witness intimidation through standard bail conditions restricting evidence tampering and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted bail to applicants Vijay Manohar Kalokhe and Mahendra Vasant Kalokhe, accused of assaulting a person with a sickle causing grievous injuries under BNS sections 109, 118, 126(2), 351, and 3(5). The court released them on personal recognizance bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties, considering they had been in custody for six months and investigation was completed with charge-sheet filed, balancing this against prosecution concerns about absconding and witness intimidation through standard bail conditions restricting evidence tampering and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts