SRBANAND LOKAI GUPA vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR. — IA/1782/2022

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010047342022

Filing Number

IA/2932/2022

Filing Date

01-Feb-2022

Registration No

IA/1782/2022

Registration Date

23-Mar-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRBANAND LOKAI GUPA

    Adv. ARVIND ANTU TARAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR.

  2. 2.RAMESH PRAKASH YADAV

    Adv. sunil rajaram more

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the applicant's interim application seeking restoration of an appeal that was dismissed for non-prosecution in 2019. The court rejected the applicant's arguments citing Covid-19 and medical grounds as justification for the 2-year delay, holding that the limitation period had already expired before March 2020 and medical reports from 2015 could not explain why the restoration application wasn't filed in 2019. The application was dismissed for being filed without sufficient cause after the limitation period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 01-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1782/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the applicant's interim application seeking restoration of an appeal that was dismissed for non-prosecution in 2019. The court rejected the applicant's arguments citing Covid-19 and medical grounds as justification for the 2-year delay, holding that the limitation period had already expired before March 2020 and medical reports from 2015 could not explain why the restoration application wasn't filed in 2019. The application was dismissed for being filed without sufficient cause after the limitation period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case