KARDA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTOR vs THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER NO. 5 AND ORS — WP/4682/2026
Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010046832026
Filing Number
WP/2734/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
WP/4682/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )
Sub-Category
Division Bench ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARDA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTOR
Adv. TUUSHAR SONAWANE
Respondent(s)
THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER NO. 5 AND ORS
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SPECIAL BRANCH NASHIK CITY
SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR, UPNAGAR POLICE STATION
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SERVED THRO GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-02-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 02-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of Karda Constructions Private Limited's writ petition seeking permission for property survey and boundary fixing in Nashik. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application with the City Survey Officer, which must be considered expeditiously within four weeks, while keeping all contentions open and without prejudging the substantive merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of Karda Constructions Private Limited's writ petition seeking permission for property survey and boundary fixing in Nashik. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application with the City Survey Officer, which must be considered expeditiously within four weeks, while keeping all contentions open and without prejudging the substantive merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts