HARSHAD HEMANT JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/383/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010042372026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/1771/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

BA/383/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 302, 307, 336, 323, 504, 34
Bombay Police Act Section 37(1) R/W 135

Petitioner(s)

HARSHAD HEMANT JADHAV

Adv. ABHISHEK R AVACHAT

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

03-02-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

29-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

02-04-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

12-03-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

Orders

29-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Summary The Bombay High Court granted regular bail to Harshad Hemant Jadhav, accused of murder and assault charges, after he had been incarcerated for over two years with no trial progress. The court found the incident arose from a sudden quarrel rather than premeditation, and considering the applicant's clean record and prolonged detention, ordered his release on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions against tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court granted regular bail to Harshad Hemant Jadhav, accused of murder and assault charges, after he had been incarcerated for over two years with no trial progress. The court found the incident arose from a sudden quarrel rather than premeditation, and considering the applicant's clean record and prolonged detention, ordered his release on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions against tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case