THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs JAMIR AHMED SHAIKH and ORS. — APEAL/1447/2003
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 378. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010042032003
Filing Number
APEAL/1447/2003
Filing Date
04-Dec-2003
Registration No
APEAL/1447/2003
Registration Date
04-Dec-2003
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAMIR AHMED SHAIKH and ORS.
-
2.MOHAMAD RUMETH AHMED SHAIKH
Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Sharma (appointed as per courts order dated 16/03/
-
3.NAJMA @ NAJMUNNISA SHAIKH (abated as per ct's order dated 24/02/
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Bombay dismissed the State's appeal challenging the trial court's acquittal of two accused in a dowry harassment and assault case. The court found the prosecution's evidence suffered from material inconsistencies, including the complainant's delayed complaint, lack of contemporaneous police reports, contradictory witness statements about hospitalization duration, and doubts about a key letter's authenticity. Medical evidence was inconclusive, and the accused's attendance records suggested he was at work during the alleged assault, creating reasonable doubt sufficient to uphold acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
For Final Hearing (Appeal Against Acquittal)-
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
27-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
27-Jun-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
25-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
07-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
-
31-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
24-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
17-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
06-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
21-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
21-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
24-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
24-Oct-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
17-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
17-Oct-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
10-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
10-Jan-2005
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
10-Jan-2005
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
08-Dec-2004
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
28-Oct-2004
Due Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
30-Sep-2004
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
30-Aug-2004
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2003
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/1447/2003
Summary The High Court of Bombay dismissed the State's appeal challenging the trial court's acquittal of two accused in a dowry harassment and assault case. The court found the prosecution's evidence suffered from material inconsistencies, including the complainant's delayed complaint, lack of contemporaneous police reports, contradictory witness statements about hospitalization duration, and doubts about a key letter's authenticity. Medical evidence was inconclusive, and the accused's attendance records suggested he was at work during the alleged assault, creating reasonable doubt sufficient to uphold acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts