THE CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION THRU THE ASST. PF COMMISSIONER vs EXOTIC CUISINE PVT. LTD. — WP/14221/2017
Case under Employment Provident Fund & Misc. P. Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010040562017
Next Hearing
13th June 2018
Filing Number
WP/2463/2017
Filing Date
25-01-2017
Registration No
WP/14221/2017
Registration Date
22-12-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION THRU THE ASST. PF COMMISSIONER
Adv. Suresh Kumar
Respondent(s)
EXOTIC CUISINE PVT. LTD.
Adv. ,Samiksha Kanani 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-06-2018 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 10-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 27-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court quashed the EPF Appellate Tribunal's order allowing Exotic Cuisine Pvt. Ltd.'s appeal, finding the Tribunal failed to properly adjudicate the dispute on merits. Though the Tribunal identified natural justice breaches, it neither adequately examined substantive contentions nor recorded clear findings, instead allowing the appeal without proper reasoning—inconsistent with appellate principles. The court remitted the matter to the Appellate Authority for fresh reconsideration with full hearing and reasoned decision-making. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court quashed the EPF Appellate Tribunal's order allowing Exotic Cuisine Pvt. Ltd.'s appeal, finding the Tribunal failed to properly adjudicate the dispute on merits. Though the Tribunal identified natural justice breaches, it neither adequately examined substantive contentions nor recorded clear findings, instead allowing the appeal without proper reasoning—inconsistent with appellate principles. The court remitted the matter to the Appellate Authority for fresh reconsideration with full hearing and reasoned decision-making. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts