SMT. SUDHA RAMESH SHELAR vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER — WP/2540/2014
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section ---. Disposed: --Partly Allowed on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010037642014
Next Hearing
16th April 2014
Filing Number
WP/2556/2014
Filing Date
29-01-2014
Registration No
WP/2540/2014
Registration Date
06-03-2014
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
MAT ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Partly Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. SUDHA RAMESH SHELAR
Adv. Prakash Devdas
Respondent(s)
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR ORDERS
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
FOR FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2014 | FOR ORDERS |
| 23-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 06-03-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 06-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 02-05-2019 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/2540/2014 - Smt. Sudha Ramesh Shelar v. MCGM The High Court of Bombay upheld an employee's unfair labour practice complaint against her compulsory retirement at age 55. The court found the Municipal Corporation's decision violated its own service guidelines and lacked objective basis, noting her recent 2010 promotion demonstrated fitness, her service record showed "Excellent" to "Good" grades, and adverse memos alone cannot justify forced retirement. She is reinstated until normal superannuation at age 58 with service continuity and consequential benefits, excluding back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/2540/2014 - Smt. Sudha Ramesh Shelar v. MCGM The High Court of Bombay upheld an employee's unfair labour practice complaint against her compulsory retirement at age 55. The court found the Municipal Corporation's decision violated its own service guidelines and lacked objective basis, noting her recent 2010 promotion demonstrated fitness, her service record showed "Excellent" to "Good" grades, and adverse memos alone cannot justify forced retirement. She is reinstated until normal superannuation at age 58 with service continuity and consequential benefits, excluding back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts