FAHEEM VASIM KHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/301/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010035322026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/1480/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

BA/301/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),21(C),29
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),(5),238

Petitioner(s)

FAHEEM VASIM KHAN

Adv. RUMMAN SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

29-01-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

05-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

30-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

02-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

13-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Case Summary: BA/301/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Faheem Vasim Khan, accused in an NDPS Act case involving 940 grams of cocaine, applying the principle of parity since a co-accused with identical charges had already been released on bail. The court found insufficient evidence of Khan's complicity beyond co-accused statements (inadmissible hearsay), noted his clean criminal record, and determined he posed no flight risk. Khan was granted bail on a ₹50,000 personal recognizance bond with standard conditions including monthly police station attendance and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/301/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Faheem Vasim Khan, accused in an NDPS Act case involving 940 grams of cocaine, applying the principle of parity since a co-accused with identical charges had already been released on bail. The court found insufficient evidence of Khan's complicity beyond co-accused statements (inadmissible hearsay), noted his clean criminal record, and determined he posed no flight risk. Khan was granted bail on a ₹50,000 personal recognizance bond with standard conditions including monthly police station attendance and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case