M.A. AGRO (PROPRIETOR MR. ASHFAK JAFAR SHEKHANI UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX RAI NOD E 0102 — CP/70/2026

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Status: For Circulation. Next hearing: : -.

For Circulation Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010031612026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

CP/1851/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CP/70/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.A. AGRO (PROPRIETOR MR. ASHFAK JAFAR SHEKHANI UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX RAI NOD E 0102

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX

  3. 3.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT

  5. 5.THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE REVENUE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay found that the case (Writ Petition 15764 of 2025) was wrongly placed on the board and ordered its removal. The court directed the Registrar Judicial to remove the matter from the board accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay found that the case (Writ Petition 15764 of 2025) was wrongly placed on the board and ordered its removal. The court directed the Registrar Judicial to remove the matter from the board accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case