M.A. AGRO (PROPRIETOR MR. ASHFAK JAFAR SHEKHANI UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX RAI NOD E 0102 — CP/70/2026
Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010031612026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
CP/1851/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
CP/70/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Division
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.A. AGRO (PROPRIETOR MR. ASHFAK JAFAR SHEKHANI UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX RAI NOD E 0102
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT
THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE REVENUE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 11-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay found that the case (Writ Petition 15764 of 2025) was wrongly placed on the board and ordered its removal. The court directed the Registrar Judicial to remove the matter from the board accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay found that the case (Writ Petition 15764 of 2025) was wrongly placed on the board and ordered its removal. The court directed the Registrar Judicial to remove the matter from the board accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts