UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING vs AJIT KUMAR PATHAK — HCBM10031462026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010031462026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

WP/1843/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

CAT related Service Matters ( 62 )

Sub-Category

Adverse Action ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Administrative Tribunal Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

    Adv. GARGE ANIRUDDHA ARUN

  2. 2.HEAD OF DEPARTMENT SSE FILMS DIVISION MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA ARUN GARGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJIT KUMAR PATHAK

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary Case: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1843 of 2026, Bombay High Court Petitioner: Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Respondent: Ajit Kumar Pathak Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 27, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1843 of 2026, Bombay High Court Petitioner: Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Respondent: Ajit Kumar Pathak Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 27, 2026 deadline. The Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case