SHEETAL KISHANCHAND TEJWANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/448/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010030242026
Filing Number
WP/1256/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/448/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Seeking Directions ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHEETAL KISHANCHAND TEJWANI
Adv. Deepali Kedar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the petition and declared the arrest and remand of Ms. Sheetal Tejwani illegal, ordering her release on PR bond. The court found that grounds of arrest were furnished only 1 hour 10 minutes before her court production, violating the Supreme Court's mandate in Mihir Rajesh Shah requiring grounds be provided at least 2 hours prior, and rejected the state's explanation that the petitioner refused service without her advocate present, as no contemporaneous record supported this claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/448/2026
The Bombay High Court allowed the petition and declared the arrest and remand of Ms. Sheetal Tejwani illegal, ordering her release on PR bond. The court found that grounds of arrest were furnished only 1 hour 10 minutes before her court production, violating the Supreme Court's mandate in Mihir Rajesh Shah requiring grounds be provided at least 2 hours prior, and rejected the state's explanation that the petitioner refused service without her advocate present, as no contemporaneous record supported this claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts