SUSHILA TULSANKAR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASTHRA AND ANR — APPLN/143/2024
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 407. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010028842024
e-Filing Number
15-01-2024
Filing Number
APPLN/1330/2024
Filing Date
16-01-2024
Registration No
APPLN/143/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL T.P. U/S 407 OF CRPC / Section 447 of BNSS ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUSHILA TULSANKAR AND ORS
Adv. RANKHAMBE VISHAL VINAYAK
GITANJAL Y SONAWALE
YOGESH D SONAWALE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASTHRA AND ANR
AUDREY G TULSANKAR
Adv. EKTA K. PATIL (Appointed Advocate through Legal Aid)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
FOR HEARING
AT 3.00 P.M.
FOR ADMISSION /HEARING
FOR ADMISSION /HEARING
FOR ADMISSION /HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-10-2024 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION /HEARING |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION /HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION /HEARING |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted the transfer of a domestic violence case (No. 266/DV/2019) from the Vasai Magistrate's Court to the Metropolitan Magistrate's 5th Court at Dadar (Sewri), Mumbai. The court prioritized the hardship faced by the senior citizen applicant over the respondent's work-related inconvenience, noting that the respondent was already appearing in two related cases at the Dadar court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted the transfer of a domestic violence case (No. 266/DV/2019) from the Vasai Magistrate's Court to the Metropolitan Magistrate's 5th Court at Dadar (Sewri), Mumbai. The court prioritized the hardship faced by the senior citizen applicant over the respondent's work-related inconvenience, noting that the respondent was already appearing in two related cases at the Dadar court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts