MEERADEVI TARACHAND JAIN KHAN JAVED AKHTAR vs BAKHTAVARMAL SAJMAL TALERA Advocate - LALIT V JAIN, VP FILED FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1a, 1b and 1c — CRA/191/2012
Case under Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010026102012
Next Hearing
09th February 2012
Filing Number
CRA/1680/2012
Filing Date
19-01-2012
Registration No
CRA/191/2012
Registration Date
03-03-2012
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEERADEVI TARACHAND JAIN KHAN JAVED AKHTAR
Respondent(s)
BAKHTAVARMAL SAJMAL TALERA Advocate - LALIT V JAIN, VP FILED FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1a, 1b and 1c
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
FOR ORDERS
RENT ACT -- FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
C.R.A. FOR ADMISSION(AFTER NOTICE)[CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
C.R.A. FOR ADMISSION(AFTER NOTICE)[CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-02-2012 | FOR ORDERS |
| 30-04-2026 | RENT ACT -- FINAL HEARING |
| 08-06-2020 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 21-11-2015 | C.R.A. FOR ADMISSION(AFTER NOTICE)[CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 12-08-2015 | C.R.A. FOR ADMISSION(AFTER NOTICE)[CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by landlord Meeradevi Tarachand Jain's legal heirs against an appellate court judgment for want of prosecution. The applicants failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (23.04.2026 and 30.04.2026), demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter, leading to dismissal under procedural rules for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by landlord Meeradevi Tarachand Jain's legal heirs against an appellate court judgment for want of prosecution. The applicants failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (23.04.2026 and 30.04.2026), demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter, leading to dismissal under procedural rules for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts