SADANANAD KAMAL PATIL AND ORS. vs REGIONAL OFFICER — IA/1533/2026
Case under Mah. Industrial Developement Rules,1962 Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010025842026
Filing Number
IA/1546/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
IA/1533/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Other Appeals - Division Bench ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SADANANAD KAMAL PATIL AND ORS.
Adv. Sachin Suryakant Punde
CHANDRABHAGA CHANDRAKANT PATIL
VISHWAJEET CHANDRAKANT PATIL
SACHIN CHANDRAKANT PATIL (DECEASED)
SANGEETA VIKRAM PATIL
VINIT VIKRAM PATIL
VINITA VIKRAM PATIL
JYOTI MANOHAR PATIL
VANITA SIDDESH PATIL
KANCHAN KESARINATH MHATRE
CHHAYA GAJANAN PATIL
Respondent(s)
REGIONAL OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
FOR CIRCULATION
INTERIM APPLICATION
FOR CIRCULATION
INTERIM APPLICATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-02-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 06-05-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 06-04-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 07-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court allowed Sadanand Kamal Patil and others to withdraw 60% of Rs. 5,25,27,116/- deposited in a land acquisition case, subject to furnishing an indemnity bond, with the remaining 40% to be invested in a fixed deposit. The court granted this relief based on the applicants' financial difficulties and consistency with similar orders passed in related appeals involving the same village and notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court allowed Sadanand Kamal Patil and others to withdraw 60% of Rs. 5,25,27,116/- deposited in a land acquisition case, subject to furnishing an indemnity bond, with the remaining 40% to be invested in a fixed deposit. The court granted this relief based on the applicants' financial difficulties and consistency with similar orders passed in related appeals involving the same village and notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts