HEMANT AWASARE AND ORS vs M/S. KAMAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. — HCBM10025232026

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010025232026

Filing Number

WP/1503/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

WORKMEN COMPENSATION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANT AWASARE AND ORS

    Adv. Aarun Dhondiram Nimbalkar

  2. 2.RAJARAM TUKARAM PHADKE

  3. 3.MOHD. TAUSIF WARSI

  4. 4.RAJESH JAISWAL

  5. 5.JANAK RAM VERMA

  6. 6.VINAY SINGH

  7. 7.PRAKASH NAGTHILAK

  8. 8.MUNNA YADAV

  9. 9.RAMESH SALAVKAR

  10. 10.KAYAMUDDIN ANSARI

  11. 11.HAMAYUN AHMED CHOUDHARY

  12. 12.RAJENDRA R. VISWAKARMA

  13. 13.RAJESH PATEL

  14. 14.SAROJ K. JHA

  15. 15.AZIMUDDIN CHOUDHARY

  16. 16.RAMESH SINGH

  17. 17.JOYNUL CHOYDHARY

  18. 18.SANTOSH RAI

  19. 19.SURENDRAKUMAR CHOUDHARY

  20. 20.TABREZ KHAN

  21. 21.NAZMUL AHAMED CHOUDHARY

  22. 22.ISMILE AHMED TAPADAR

  23. 23.SALIM KHAN

  24. 24.ASLAM QURESHI

  25. 25.CHANDRABHAVAN YADAV

  26. 26.SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV

  27. 27.ABILUDDIN TAPADAR

  28. 28.KITTABUDDIN SIDDHIQUE

  29. 29.MOHAMMED SAJJAD SHAIKH

  30. 30.SHRIKANT PADHI

  31. 31.RANJIT SONAVALE

  32. 32.NARENDRA KUMAR

  33. 33.RAMDAS SHELKE

  34. 34.NAVNATH DEVKAR

  35. 35.CHANDRAPRAKASH YADAV

  36. 36.VIJAY RAI

  37. 37.DINESH RAJBHAR

  38. 38.KAILASH KEDAR YADAV

  39. 39.ASHOK SINGH

  40. 40.SACHIN PARAB

  41. 41.PURUSHOTTAM GIRI

  42. 42.DEVENDRA PRATAP SINGH

  43. 43.DHARMENDRA KUMAR PASWAN

  44. 44.MUNDRIKA SINGH

  45. 45.KARAMAT SHAIKH

  46. 46.UPENDRA SINGH

  47. 47.RAVINDRANATH DUBEY

  48. 48.NATHU SAKHARAM DIGHE

  49. 49.MANOJ KUMAR YADAV

  50. 50.JAGANNATH GIRI

  51. 51.SHRAVAN KUMAR

  52. 52.PRAMILBAI JAWARE

  53. 53.NEERA DHARMA DHAPLE

  54. 54.SAKUNTHALABAI MITHARE

  55. 55.CHITRA UPENDRA MHATRE

  56. 56.JAYSHREE PATIL

  57. 57.MARIYAM UPENDRA MHATRE

  58. 58.SANJAY YADAV

  59. 59.HARISHCHANDRA SHITKAR

  60. 60.BABAN PEDNEKAR

  61. 61.IBRAHIM AHMED TAPADKAR

  62. 62.ABDUL MOHIM SHAIKH

  63. 63.PRANAV TAMBADKAR

  64. 64.AFTAB ALAM KHAN

  65. 65.GAYASUDDIN KHAN

  66. 66.SHAKIL AHMED BHARTIYA

  67. 67.UMESH PRAJAPATI

  68. 68.SHABBIR AHMED CHOUDHARY

  69. 69.DEVENDRA PRATAP SINGH

  70. 70.ISMILE AHMED CHOUDHARY

  71. 71.NAJMUL ISLAM CHOUDHARY

  72. 72.SHAILESH TIWARI

  73. 73.ARIF AHMED CHOUDHARY

  74. 74.RAMBAHAL CHOUHAN

  75. 75.ABDUL VASHID TAPADAR

  76. 76.FIROZ ANSARI

  77. 77.ABDUL MALIK

  78. 78.PAPPU MISHRA

  79. 79.ROHAN KUDVE

  80. 80.DINESH RAJBHAR

  81. 81.MILAN CHOUDHARY

  82. 82.AFTAB ANIRUDDIN KHAN

  83. 83.ASHOK SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. KAMAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1503 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court was granted one final opportunity to remove office objections within two weeks. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to comply with directions despite being given extension time. If office objections are not removed within the prescribed two-week deadline, the writ petition's registration, including any interim applications, will be automatically refused without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1503 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court was granted one final opportunity to remove office objections within two weeks. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to comply with directions despite being given extension time. If office objections are not removed within the prescribed two-week deadline, the writ petition's registration, including any interim applications, will be automatically refused without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case