DIPAKKUMAR KAPOORCHAND BHATI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10024962026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010024962026

Filing Number

WP/1490/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPAKKUMAR KAPOORCHAND BHATI

    Adv. Adv Santosh Musale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.DY. COLLECTOR (ENC/REM) AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY COLABA DIVISION

  3. 3.ADMINISTRATOR AND DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER KOKAN DIVISION MUMBAI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1490 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court was directed to be listed after the petitioner failed to remove office objections despite prior notifications. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted one final opportunity of two weeks to remove office objections without fail, with an automatic refusal of registration (including interim applications) upon non-compliance, without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1490 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court was directed to be listed after the petitioner failed to remove office objections despite prior notifications. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted one final opportunity of two weeks to remove office objections without fail, with an automatic refusal of registration (including interim applications) upon non-compliance, without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case