MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD vs INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS (BOMBAY) PVT. LTD. Advocate - Poorvi Kamani — WP/1595/2026
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010024952026
Filing Number
WP/1489/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
WP/1595/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
Adv. Kavita Solunke
Respondent(s)
INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS (BOMBAY) PVT. LTD. Advocate - Poorvi Kamani
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
RENT ACT -- ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-02-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 02-04-2026 | RENT ACT -- ADMISSION |
| 09-03-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/1595/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed MTDC's writ petition challenging an Executing Court order refusing to declare a mesne profits decree non-executable. The court found MTDC's challenge constituted gross abuse of process, as MTDC had exhausted all appellate remedies (including Supreme Court review) on the underlying eviction decree, actively participated in mesne profits proceedings, and only now sought to re-agitate identical grounds of fraud and jurisdictional defect previously rejected by higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/1595/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed MTDC's writ petition challenging an Executing Court order refusing to declare a mesne profits decree non-executable. The court found MTDC's challenge constituted gross abuse of process, as MTDC had exhausted all appellate remedies (including Supreme Court review) on the underlying eviction decree, actively participated in mesne profits proceedings, and only now sought to re-agitate identical grounds of fraud and jurisdictional defect previously rejected by higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts