MADHUKAR VIKRAM PAWAR vs SHRI UMESH WAVRE DY. CONSERVATOR OF FOREST — CP/41/2026

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010024922026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

CP/1487/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

CP/41/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHUKAR VIKRAM PAWAR

    Adv. SUCHITA JAIRAM PAWAR

  2. 2.Subhash Mansing Kachave (deceased) Through Its legal heir Nirmala Subhash Kachave (wife)

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

  3. 3.Sahebrao Bhaurao Patil Through its Legal Heir Dagubai Sahebrao Patil

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

  4. 4.Pandurang Govinda Sonawane Through its Legal Heir Ukhabai Pandurang Sonawane

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

  5. 5.Kantilal Amrit Valke

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

  6. 6.Shivaji Balchand Shewale

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

  7. 7.Bhaurao Supdu Padmar

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

  8. 8.Pandharinath Shrawan Kachave

    Adv. PAWAR SUCHITA JAIRAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI UMESH WAVRE DY. CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

  2. 2.SHRI RISHIKESH RANJAN ADDI PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (ADMINISTRATION SECOND DIVISION)

  3. 3.ADDI PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court found a prima facie case of contempt against respondents (Dy. Conservator of Forest and others) for willfully disobeying its November 2023 order directing wage calculations for permanent workers—despite being granted a 4-month deadline and an additional 12-week extension after their review application was dismissed in June 2025. The Court issued notice under Rule 9 (returnable April 16, 2026) and directed respondents 1 and 2 to remain personally present to explain their continued non-compliance with judicial directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court found a prima facie case of contempt against respondents (Dy. Conservator of Forest and others) for willfully disobeying its November 2023 order directing wage calculations for permanent workers—despite being granted a 4-month deadline and an additional 12-week extension after their review application was dismissed in June 2025. The Court issued notice under Rule 9 (returnable April 16, 2026) and directed respondents 1 and 2 to remain personally present to explain their continued non-compliance with judicial directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case