Sandip Ajitkumar Shukla vs The State of Maharashtra Through Public Prosecturo High Court Appellate Side Mumbai — REVN/25/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010023292026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

13-01-2026

Filing Number

REVN/945/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

REVN/25/2026

Registration Date

17-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act 1988 Section 8(c), 22, 29

Petitioner(s)

Sandip Ajitkumar Shukla

Adv. MOREY SAHIL SHUDDHODHANA

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Public Prosecturo High Court Appellate Side Mumbai

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

03-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

06-05-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

23-03-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

16-03-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

The Bombay High Court allowed Sandip Ajitkumar Shukla's criminal revision application and discharged him from an NDPS drug case. The court found that while a co-accused had disclosed a person named "Sunny" provided Mephedrone in 2015, the applicant was arrested only in 2018 with no documentary evidence linking him to "Sunny," making continued prosecution an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Sandip Ajitkumar Shukla's criminal revision application and discharged him from an NDPS drug case. The court found that while a co-accused had disclosed a person named "Sunny" provided Mephedrone in 2015, the applicant was arrested only in 2018 with no documentary evidence linking him to "Sunny," making continued prosecution an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case