KANTABAI TUKARAM VIDHATE ALIAS KANTABAI DAGADU BANKAR AND ORS vs RAMCHANDRA DAGADU BANKAR AND ORS — IA/385/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Allowed on 23rd January 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010022092026

Filing Number

IA/1294/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

IA/385/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Jan-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANTABAI TUKARAM VIDHATE ALIAS KANTABAI DAGADU BANKAR AND ORS

    Adv. advpdkavale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA DAGADU BANKAR AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ramchandra Bankar and another seeking referral of a compensation apportionment dispute to the Principal Civil Court. The court held that since the District Level Acquisition Committee approved conversion of the land acquisition to compulsory acquisition under Section 19B(3) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, the consent award became meaningless and the apportionment dispute would only arise after a new land acquisition award is passed. The court vacated interim relief and reserved liberty for parties to pursue apportionment remedies after the compulsory acquisition process concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  8. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ramchandra Bankar and another seeking referral of a compensation apportionment dispute to the Principal Civil Court. The court held that since the District Level Acquisition Committee approved conversion of the land acquisition to compulsory acquisition under Section 19B(3) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, the consent award became meaningless and the apportionment dispute would only arise after a new land acquisition award is passed. The court vacated interim relief and reserved liberty for parties to pursue apportionment remedies after the compulsory acquisition process concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case