BHARAT BASTIMAL JAIN SHRI. NITIN JADHAV vs NARAYAN SHISRAO GOARE AND ANR. — APEAL/47/2009
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010020782009
Filing Number
APEAL/58/2009
Filing Date
19-Jan-2009
Registration No
APEAL/47/2009
Registration Date
19-Jan-2009
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARAT BASTIMAL JAIN SHRI. NITIN JADHAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARAYAN SHISRAO GOARE AND ANR.
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court transferred the criminal appeal challenging an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the Court of Sessions, holding that appellants have a statutory right to challenge acquittals under Section 372 CrPC, and the Sessions Court is the competent forum to properly adjudicate such appeals. The court directed the Registrar to promptly transmit the complete case record and requested the Sessions Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously given its prolonged pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2011
For Orders [Criminal Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia
-
07-Oct-2011
For Orders [Criminal Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia
-
28-Sep-2011
For Orders [Criminal Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia
-
24-Sep-2010
For Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
31-Aug-2010
Due Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade
-
19-Jan-2009
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/47/2009
-
06-Jan-2009
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
Case Summary The Bombay High Court transferred the criminal appeal challenging an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the Court of Sessions, holding that appellants have a statutory right to challenge acquittals under Section 372 CrPC, and the Sessions Court is the competent forum to properly adjudicate such appeals. The court directed the Registrar to promptly transmit the complete case record and requested the Sessions Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously given its prolonged pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts