RAMRATI SETBHAN GOUND AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS PRINCIPALSEC URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND ORS — HCBM10020712026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010020712026

Filing Number

WP/1231/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMRATI SETBHAN GOUND AND ANR

    Adv. F N Momin

  2. 2.SHRIKRISHNA SETBHAN GOUND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS PRINCIPALSEC URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.BHIWANDI NIZAMPUR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRO ITS COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING,BHIWANDI NIZAMPUR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1231 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner's advocate a final two-week deadline to remove outstanding office objections, after the petitioner had previously failed to comply despite earlier notices and extensions. The court warned that failure to remove these objections within the prescribed period will result in automatic refusal of registration of the writ petition and any interim applications without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 1231 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner's advocate a final two-week deadline to remove outstanding office objections, after the petitioner had previously failed to comply despite earlier notices and extensions. The court warned that failure to remove these objections within the prescribed period will result in automatic refusal of registration of the writ petition and any interim applications without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case