SAYYED IBRAHIM SAYYED HANIF vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS PRINCIPAL SEC. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND ORS — WP/1643/2026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010020372026

Filing Number

WP/1211/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/1643/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAYYED IBRAHIM SAYYED HANIF

    Adv. F N Momin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS PRINCIPAL SEC. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.BHIWANDI NIZAMPUR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of consolidated writ petitions filed by shop owners whose establishments were demolished for road widening in Bhiwandi, directing the Municipal Corporation to decide their compensation claims within eight weeks. The court found merit in the petitioners' grievances regarding non-payment of compensation and accepted the Corporation's submission that representations could be resolved within a time-bound period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1643/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of consolidated writ petitions filed by shop owners whose establishments were demolished for road widening in Bhiwandi, directing the Municipal Corporation to decide their compensation claims within eight weeks. The court found merit in the petitioners' grievances regarding non-payment of compensation and accepted the Corporation's submission that representations could be resolved within a time-bound period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case