SAU. GITABAI PANNALAL SURANA(D/H) vs SURAJMAL POONAMCHAND SISODIYA (D/H) — CAS/436/2014
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010018192014
Next Hearing
24th November 2020
Filing Number
CAS/1306/2014
Filing Date
16-01-2014
Registration No
CAS/436/2014
Registration Date
19-03-2014
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAU. GITABAI PANNALAL SURANA(D/H)
Adv. Ajay S Patil
Respondent(s)
SURAJMAL POONAMCHAND SISODIYA (D/H)
Adv. R.NO.1E STANDS ABATED AS PER REG.JUDL.II ORDER DT.,12/2/2015 PASSED IN S.A. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-11-2020 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 29-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 176 of 2014 for non-prosecution because the appellants failed to appear on the hearing date of 29th April 2026, despite prior notice that the appeal would be listed for dismissal. Consequently, the civil application filed alongside the appeal was also disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 176 of 2014 for non-prosecution because the appellants failed to appear on the hearing date of 29th April 2026, despite prior notice that the appeal would be listed for dismissal. Consequently, the civil application filed alongside the appeal was also disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts