SAU. GITABAI PANNALAL SURANA(D/H) vs SURAJMAL POONAMCHAND SISODIYA (D/H) — CAS/436/2014
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010018192014
Filing Number
CAS/1306/2014
Filing Date
16-Jan-2014
Registration No
CAS/436/2014
Registration Date
19-Mar-2014
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAU. GITABAI PANNALAL SURANA(D/H)
Adv. Ajay S Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURAJMAL POONAMCHAND SISODIYA (D/H)
Adv. R.NO.1E STANDS ABATED AS PER REG.JUDL.II ORDER DT.,12/2/2015 PASSED IN S.A. 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 176 of 2014 for non-prosecution because the appellants failed to appear on the hearing date of 29th April 2026, despite prior notice that the appeal would be listed for dismissal. Consequently, the civil application filed alongside the appeal was also disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2014
Case filed
Registration No. CAS/436/2014
The Bombay High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 176 of 2014 for non-prosecution because the appellants failed to appear on the hearing date of 29th April 2026, despite prior notice that the appeal would be listed for dismissal. Consequently, the civil application filed alongside the appeal was also disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts