SAU. GITABAI PANNALAL SURANA(D/H)(Legal Heir) vs SURAJMAL POONAMCHAND SISODIYA (D/H) — SA/176/2014
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010018152014
Next Hearing
30th June 2014
Filing Number
SA/1303/2014
Filing Date
16-01-2014
Registration No
SA/176/2014
Registration Date
19-03-2014
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAU. GITABAI PANNALAL SURANA(D/H)(Legal Heir)
Adv. Ajay S Patil 1.
PANNALAL RATANCHAND SURANA1.
SUBHASH PANNALAL SURANA1.
VIJAYA BANSIMAL LUNIYA1.
SURESH PANNALAL SURANA1.
SATISH PANNALAL SURANA
Respondent(s)
SURAJMAL POONAMCHAND SISODIYA (D/H)
Adv. FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1A TO 1D,R NO 1F & 1G ARE SERVED.,R.NO.1E STANDS ABATED AS PER REG.JUDL.II ORDER DT.,12/2/2015 PASSED HEREIN.,M M SATHAYE 1123 1.
ZANKARBAI SURAJMAL SISODIYA1.
PRAKASH SURAJMAL SISODIYA1.
SUBHASH SURAJMAL SISODIYA1.
RAMESH SURAJMAL SISODIYA1.
RAJENDRAKUMAR SURAJMAL SISODIYA1.
SAU. NEMIBAI CHANDRAKANT DHADIWAL1.
SAU. SULOCHANA ASHOKKUMAR TATIYA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-06-2014 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 29-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 24-11-2020 | FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 09-09-2015 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 15-01-2015 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 176 of 2014 for non-prosecution because the appellants failed to appear on multiple dates despite the appeal being listed for dismissal. Consequently, the associated Civil Application No. 436 of 2014 was disposed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 176 of 2014 for non-prosecution because the appellants failed to appear on multiple dates despite the appeal being listed for dismissal. Consequently, the associated Civil Application No. 436 of 2014 was disposed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts