FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MUMBAI vs POOJA VIJAY MARGAJ AND ORS. — IA/1381/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010017582025

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

Filing Number

IA/1095/2025

Filing Date

09-01-2025

Registration No

IA/1381/2025

Registration Date

31-01-2025

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MUMBAI

Adv. RES JURIS

Respondent(s)

POOJA VIJAY MARGAJ AND ORS.

AADITYA VIJAY MARGAJ MINOR THR. GUARDIAN MOTHER RESP.

SHREYA VIJAY MARGAJ MINOR THR. GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E. RESP.

CHABUBAI NIVRUTTI MARGAJ

MANOJ MILK SUPPLERS

DINESH DATTATREY TALEKAR

Hearing History

Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

26-06-2025

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

07-05-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

22-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

11-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

12-12-2025

FOR ORDERS (SPARE COPY/IES NOT SUPPLIED)

Orders

23-04-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Case Summary: In IA/1381/2025 before the Bombay High Court (dated 23/04/2026), the notice served upon respondent No. 5 was returned unserved. The court directed the applicant's advocate to take appropriate steps within two weeks for effecting service on the unserved respondent as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to serve would result in dismissal of the Interim Application at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In IA/1381/2025 before the Bombay High Court (dated 23/04/2026), the notice served upon respondent No. 5 was returned unserved. The court directed the applicant's advocate to take appropriate steps within two weeks for effecting service on the unserved respondent as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to serve would result in dismissal of the Interim Application at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case