MR. NAZIR ABDUL RAZAK SHAIKH vs M/S. AIR LIQUID INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. Advocate - SUYASH GADRE — WP/142/2021
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010017262021
Filing Number
WP/887/2021
Filing Date
13-Jan-2021
Registration No
WP/142/2021
Registration Date
13-Jan-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
MAT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR. NAZIR ABDUL RAZAK SHAIKH
Adv. Archana S Shelar
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. AIR LIQUID INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. Advocate - SUYASH GADRE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Nazir Abdul Razak Shaikh against Air Liquid India Holdings Pvt. Ltd., holding that the petitioner was not a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act but rather an independent contractor after February 28, 2006. The court found that the petitioner's resignation, acceptance of full and final settlement (Rs. 95,562), contractor-styled bills issued in his name, tax deduction records (Form 16A), and absence from later muster rolls collectively established that the original employment ended in February 2006 and a contractor arrangement thereafter existed, rejecting his claim for reinstatement with back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
19-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
19-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
12-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
04-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
07-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
First On Board (Fob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
24-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
24-Sep-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
03-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
25-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
26-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
16-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
06-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
06-Feb-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
- 05-Dec-2024
-
13-Dec-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik
-
18-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF
-
18-Oct-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik
-
27-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF
-
27-Sep-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik
-
12-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF
-
29-Jul-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. SambreView PDF
-
28-Mar-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
25-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
25-Feb-2022
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
05-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
05-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WP/142/2021
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Nazir Abdul Razak Shaikh against Air Liquid India Holdings Pvt. Ltd., holding that the petitioner was not a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act but rather an independent contractor after February 28, 2006. The court found that the petitioner's resignation, acceptance of full and final settlement (Rs. 95,562), contractor-styled bills issued in his name, tax deduction records (Form 16A), and absence from later muster rolls collectively established that the original employment ended in February 2006 and a contractor arrangement thereafter existed, rejecting his claim for reinstatement with back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts