ADMIRECON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs FAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD — COARP/15/2024

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010017012024

e-Filing Number

09-01-2024

Filing Number

COARP/952/2024

Filing Date

10-Jan-2024

Registration No

COARP/15/2024

Registration Date

06-Mar-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Apr-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADMIRECON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

    Adv. PRAXIS LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  3. 24-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  4. 24-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Aniesh Jadhav as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between Admirecon Infrastructure and FAM Co-Operative Housing Society arising from their February 2019 arbitration agreement. The court rejected the contractually-named consultant-arbitrator due to conflict of interest, as the consultant was involved in project execution, and appointed an independent arbitrator instead while establishing procedural guidelines for the arbitration proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Apr-2025

    Final Hearing - Section 11 / 14 / 15

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  6. 20-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  7. 20-Mar-2025

    Final Hearing - Section 11 / 14 / 15

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  8. 27-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  9. 27-Feb-2025

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 11

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  10. 20-Jan-2025

    For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  11. 16-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  12. 16-Dec-2024

    For Orders (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  13. 02-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  14. 02-Dec-2024

    For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  15. 25-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  16. 19-Nov-2024

    For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  17. 16-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  18. 16-Oct-2024

    For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  19. 30-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  20. 30-Sep-2024

    For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  21. 11-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  22. 11-Sep-2024

    For Hearing (Arbitration Petition U/S. 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  23. 27-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  24. 27-Aug-2024

    For Circulation (Arbitration Petition U/S 11

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  25. 19-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  26. 19-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 10-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. COARP/15/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Aniesh Jadhav as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between Admirecon Infrastructure and FAM Co-Operative Housing Society arising from their February 2019 arbitration agreement. The court rejected the contractually-named consultant-arbitrator due to conflict of interest, as the consultant was involved in project execution, and appointed an independent arbitrator instead while establishing procedural guidelines for the arbitration proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case