NANDKISHOR TARACHAND JAGTAP vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — APEAL/42/2026

Case under The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes(prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 14A, 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010015732026

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

APEAL/640/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

APEAL/42/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )

Sub-Category

Against Order under SC-ST Act (Section 14-A-Other) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes(prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 14A, 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

NANDKISHOR TARACHAND JAGTAP

Adv. Rohan Hogle

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dattatray Pandurang Dhengale

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

19-01-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

19-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

15-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

09-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

17-02-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case of Nandkishor Tarachand Jagtap v. State of Maharashtra was adjourned due to paucity of time. The matter has been stood over to 19th June 2026, with any interim orders granted previously to continue until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case of Nandkishor Tarachand Jagtap v. State of Maharashtra was adjourned due to paucity of time. The matter has been stood over to 19th June 2026, with any interim orders granted previously to continue until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case