MRS. SUREKHA UMESH POOJARI AND ORS. vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT — HCBM10014962026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010014962026
Filing Number
IA/891/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MRS. SUREKHA UMESH POOJARI AND ORS.
Adv. NIKHIL MISHRA
-
2.RIA UMESH POOJARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The Interim Application is allowed and disposed of. The High Court of Bombay directed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Mumbai to forthwith return the original title documents (including Agreement for Sale and Society Share Certificate) of the applicants' property in Khernagar, Mumbai, which were deposited as security in 2007. The court found no justification for MSRTC retaining the documents after withdrawing its appeal and the tribunal's order favoring the applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The Interim Application is allowed and disposed of. The High Court of Bombay directed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Mumbai to forthwith return the original title documents (including Agreement for Sale and Society Share Certificate) of the applicants' property in Khernagar, Mumbai, which were deposited as security in 2007. The court found no justification for MSRTC retaining the documents after withdrawing its appeal and the tribunal's order favoring the applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts