RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., MUMBAI vs POONAM MARUTI SASNE THR.ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN GANESH DATTATRAYA HARIHAR AND ORS. Advocate - Balasaheb Deshmukh — FA/412/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010014802022

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

FA/978/2022

Filing Date

10-01-2022

Registration No

FA/412/2022

Registration Date

04-05-2022

Judge

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE , NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Coram

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE , NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173
Public Premises (Eviction) Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., MUMBAI

Adv. KALPANA TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

POONAM MARUTI SASNE THR.ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN GANESH DATTATRAYA HARIHAR AND ORS. Advocate - Balasaheb Deshmukh

AAPPASAHEB VISHNU KOLPE

Adv. Ganesh Bhujbal

RAHUL BALU BIDGAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE , NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

28-06-2022

FOR CIRCULATION

12-06-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

27-03-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

26-02-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

11-02-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

09-05-2026
HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE,NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Case Summary: FA/412/2022 On 9th May 2026, the Bombay High Court's Lok Adalat heard Reliance General Insurance Co. Limited's appeal against Poonam Maruti Sasne and others. The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal but failed to appear before the court on both the morning and afternoon sessions despite being scheduled. The court adjourned the case and directed the appellant or its legal representative to appear physically at the next Lok Adalat hearing, posting the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA/412/2022 On 9th May 2026, the Bombay High Court's Lok Adalat heard Reliance General Insurance Co. Limited's appeal against Poonam Maruti Sasne and others. The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal but failed to appear before the court on both the morning and afternoon sessions despite being scheduled. The court adjourned the case and directed the appellant or its legal representative to appear physically at the next Lok Adalat hearing, posting the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case