MOHD ARIF MOHD GAUS SAYYAD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5236/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010007532026
Filing Number
WP/467/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
WP/5236/2026
Registration Date
17-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Project Affected Persons ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHD ARIF MOHD GAUS SAYYAD
Adv. F N Momin
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS
BHIWANDI NIZAMPUR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-02-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 23-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of WP/5236/2026 and related consolidated petitions by directing the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation to decide petitioners' compensation representations within eight weeks according to law. The petitioners' shops/galas were demolished for road widening without compensation payment, and the court found merit in allowing time-bound resolution of their grievances through the representation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of WP/5236/2026 and related consolidated petitions by directing the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation to decide petitioners' compensation representations within eight weeks according to law. The petitioners' shops/galas were demolished for road widening without compensation payment, and the court found merit in allowing time-bound resolution of their grievances through the representation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts