ASHOK SHITALAPRASAD SHARMA AND ANR. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/52/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010007232026

Filing Number

IA/269/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

IA/52/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Modification ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK SHITALAPRASAD SHARMA AND ANR.

    Adv. AKHILESH SINGH

  2. 2.AKASH ASHOK SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed the applicants' interim application and deleted bail condition (d) requiring them to report to Virar Police Station once every two months. The court found no proper reason for continuing the condition, noting the applicants had complied for 2.5 years without breach, and prosecution provided no justification. The IO may issue a written notice requiring appearance only if interference with prosecution evidence is detected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Circulation -1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the applicants' interim application and deleted bail condition (d) requiring them to report to Virar Police Station once every two months. The court found no proper reason for continuing the condition, noting the applicants had complied for 2.5 years without breach, and prosecution provided no justification. The IO may issue a written notice requiring appearance only if interference with prosecution evidence is detected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case